Systems Analysis Team Project Evaluation | ||||||
Team: | Team 2 | |||||
Project: | Westfield Township School District | |||||
Team Overview | Possible Score | Subtotal Possible | Score | Sub-total Score | ||
Teamwork | 15 | 15 | 14.746 | |||
Your team self-evaluations | 5 | 5 | ||||
Instructor's evaluation of your team | 4 | 4 | ||||
Your evaluation by other teams | 3 | 2.746 | ||||
Your evaluation of other teams | 3 | 3 | ||||
Individual Contribution | 10 | 9 | ||||
Average individual contribution to the team effort | 10 | 9 | ||||
Presentation | 29 | 29 | 27.25 | |||
Your apparent understanding of the material | 8 | 8 | ||||
Your coverage of required points | 7 | 7 | ||||
Your team's effectiveness in explaining orally | 7 | 5.25 | ||||
Your team's use of presentation technology | 7 | 7 | ||||
Written Report | 46 | 46 | 42 | |||
1. Table of contents. | 2 | 2 | ||||
2. General statement | 3 | 3 | ||||
3. List of documents used in the system: | ||||||
a. Who prepares them; | 1 | 1 | ||||
b. Number of copies and distribution; | 1 | 1 | ||||
c. Sample of each. | 1 | 1 | ||||
4. List of persons and duties | 2 | 2 | ||||
5. System flowchart and/or data flow diagram | 4 | 4 | ||||
6. Organization chart | 4 | 3 | ||||
7. Narrative description of each processing step. | 3 | 3 | ||||
8. System evaluation. | 3 | 3 | ||||
9. Proposal for system improvement, including: | ||||||
a. Executive summary of proposal | 2 | 2 | ||||
b. Cost-benefit analysis | 4 | 4 | ||||
c. Revised system flowchart and/or data flow diagram | 3 | 1 | ||||
d. Implementation plan narrative | 3 | 3 | ||||
e. Implementation plan Gantt or Pert chart | 4 | 4 | ||||
10. Course Evaluation. | 1 | 1 | ||||
Style and Formatting of Written Presentation | 5 | 4 | ||||
Total | Treated as percent of project value in your grade | 100 | 93 |
Systems Analysis Team Project Evaluation | ||||||
Team: | Team 2 | |||||
Project: | Westfield Township School District | |||||
Team Member: | John Kurz | Possible Score | Subtotal Possible | Score | Sub-total Score | |
Teamwork | 15 | 15 | 14.7 | |||
Your team self-evaluations | 5 | 5 | ||||
Instructor's evaluation of your team | 4 | 4 | ||||
Your evaluation by other teams | 3 | 2.746 | ||||
Your evaluation of other teams | 3 | 3 | ||||
Individual Contribution | 10 | 10 | ||||
Your individual contribution to the team effort | 10 | 10 | ||||
Presentation | 29 | 29 | 27.3 | |||
Your apparent understanding of the material | 8 | 8 | ||||
Your coverage of required points | 7 | 7 | ||||
Your team's effectiveness in explaining orally | 7 | 5.25 | ||||
Your team's use of presentation technology | 7 | 7 | ||||
Written Report | 46 | 46 | 42 | |||
1. Table of contents. | 2 | 2 | ||||
2. General statement | 3 | 3 | ||||
3. List of documents used in the system: | ||||||
a. Who prepares them; | 1 | 1 | ||||
b. Number of copies and distribution; | 1 | 1 | ||||
c. Sample of each. | 1 | 1 | ||||
4. List of persons and duties | 2 | 2 | ||||
5. System flowchart and/or data flow diagram | 4 | 4 | ||||
6. Organization chart | 4 | 3 | ||||
7. Narrative description of each processing step. | 3 | 3 | ||||
8. System evaluation. | 3 | 3 | ||||
9. Proposal for system improvement, including: | ||||||
a. Executive summary of proposal | 2 | 2 | ||||
b. Cost-benefit analysis | 4 | 4 | ||||
c. Revised system flowchart and/or data flow diagram | 3 | 1 | ||||
d. Implementation plan narrative | 3 | 3 | ||||
e. Implementation plan Gantt or Pert chart | 4 | 4 | ||||
10. Course Evaluation. | 1 | 1 | ||||
Style and Formatting of Written Presentation | 5 | 4 | ||||
Total | Treated as percent of project value in your grade | 100 | 94 |
Systems Analysis Team Project Evaluation | ||||||
Team: | Team 2 | |||||
Project: | Westfield Township School District | |||||
Team Member: | Della Rizak | Possible Score | Subtotal Possible | Score | Sub-total Score | |
Teamwork | 15 | 15 | 14.7 | |||
Your team self-evaluations | 5 | 5 | ||||
Instructor's evaluation of your team | 4 | 4 | ||||
Your evaluation by other teams | 3 | 2.746 | ||||
Your evaluation of other teams | 3 | 3 | ||||
Individual Contribution | 10 | 7 | ||||
Your individual contribution to the team effort | 10 | 7 | ||||
Presentation | 29 | 29 | 27.3 | |||
Your apparent understanding of the material | 8 | 8 | ||||
Your coverage of required points | 7 | 7 | ||||
Your team's effectiveness in explaining orally | 7 | 5.25 | ||||
Your team's use of presentation technology | 7 | 7 | ||||
Written Report | 46 | 46 | 42 | |||
1. Table of contents. | 2 | 2 | ||||
2. General statement | 3 | 3 | ||||
3. List of documents used in the system: | ||||||
a. Who prepares them; | 1 | 1 | ||||
b. Number of copies and distribution; | 1 | 1 | ||||
c. Sample of each. | 1 | 1 | ||||
4. List of persons and duties | 2 | 2 | ||||
5. System flowchart and/or data flow diagram | 4 | 4 | ||||
6. Organization chart | 4 | 3 | ||||
7. Narrative description of each processing step. | 3 | 3 | ||||
8. System evaluation. | 3 | 3 | ||||
9. Proposal for system improvement, including: | ||||||
a. Executive summary of proposal | 2 | 2 | ||||
b. Cost-benefit analysis | 4 | 4 | ||||
c. Revised system flowchart and/or data flow diagram | 3 | 1 | ||||
d. Implementation plan narrative | 3 | 3 | ||||
e. Implementation plan Gantt or Pert chart | 4 | 4 | ||||
10. Course Evaluation. | 1 | 1 | ||||
Style and Formatting of Written Presentation | 5 | 4 | ||||
Total | Treated as percent of project value in your grade | 100 | 91 |